UK Covid-19 Crowd Forecasting Challenge - Evaluation
2021-07-19
Welcome to the UK Covid-19 Forecasting Challenge evaluation board!
Below you find a visualisation of all forecasts made for the UK Covid-19 Crowd Forecasting Challenge as well as an evaluation of the forecasts.
If you want to learn more about the crowd forecasting challenge and how to participate, visit crowdforecastr.org
Visualisation of the combined crowd forecast
The plot shows the combined forecast of all participants. Forecasts are combined by taking the average of all predictions. The date of the tab marks the date on which a forecast was made.
2021-07-12
Cases
Deaths
2021-07-05
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-28
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-21
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-14
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-07
Cases
Deaths
2021-05-31
Cases
Deaths
2021-05-24
Cases
Deaths
Forecast visualisation
Visualisation of individual forecasts. The date of the tab marks the date on which a forecast was made.
2021-07-12
Cases
Deaths
2021-07-05
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-28
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-21
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-14
Cases
Deaths
2021-06-07
Cases
Deaths
2021-05-31
Cases
Deaths
2021-05-24
Cases
Deaths
Leaderboard
Detailed forecast scores
Scores separated by target and forecast horizon.
Cases
1 week ahead horizon
2 weeks ahead horizon
3 weeks ahead horizon
4 weeks ahead horizon
Deaths
1 week ahead horizon
2 weeks ahead horizon
3 weeks ahead horizon
4 weeks ahead horizon
Evaluation metrics
- Relative skill is a metric based on the weighted interval score (WIS) that is using a ‘pairwise comparison tournament’. All pairs of forecasters are compared against each other in terms of the weighted interval score. The mean score of both models based on the set of common targets for which both models have made a prediction are calculated to obtain mean score ratios. The relative skill is the geometric mean of these mean score ratios. Smaller values are better and a value smaller than one means that the model beats the average forecasting model.
- The weighted interval score is a proper scoring rule (meaning you can’t cheat it) suited to scoring forecasts in an interval format. It has three components: sharpness, underprediction and overprediction. Sharpness is the width of the prediction interval. Over- and underprediction only come into play if the prediction interval does not cover the true value. They are the absolute value of the difference between the upper or lower bound of the prediction interval (depending on whether the forecast is too high or too low).
- coverage deviation is the average difference between nominal and empirical interval coverage. Say the 50 percent prediction interval covers only 20 percent of all true values, then the coverage deviation is 0.5 - 0.2 = -0.3. The coverage deviation value in the table is calculated by averaging over the coverage deviation calculated for all possible prediction intervals. If the value is negative you have covered less then you should. If it is positve, then the forecasts could be a little more confident.
- bias is a measure between -1 and 1 that expresses the tendency to underpredict (-1) or overpredict (1). In contrast to the over- and underprediction components of the WIS it is bound between -1 and 1 and cannot go to infinity. It is therefore less susceptible to outliers.
- aem is the absolute error of the median forecasts. A high aem means the median forecasts tend to be far away from the true values.
Evolution of scores over time
Visualisation of the weighted interval score over time. In addition, the components of the interval score, sharpness (how narrow are forecasts - smaller is better), and penalties for underprediction and overprediction are shown. Scores are again separated by forecast horizon
Number of participants
## location_name target_variable sd mean min max median
## 1: United Kingdom inc case 12.24453 24.75 15 54 21.5
## 2: United Kingdom inc death 11.25040 22.50 13 49 20.0